[xen-tools-discuss] Commit access for others / Git or Hg?
Jonathan Aquilina
eagles051387 at gmail.com
Sat Apr 10 14:36:50 CEST 2010
only reason i suggested SF is i have seen it for another project one on a
bigger scale and pull from the git repo isnt bad at all not sure about
commiting as i havent had time to join the dev team of this particular
project. i just thought i would throw my 2 cents in there.
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Steve Kemp <steve at steve.org.uk> wrote:
> I thought that hatred of SF.net was near universal, so I guess
> I've learned something new today.
>
> I have no preference, since I'll almost certainly not be commiting,
> but I find SF painful to navigate, slow, and clunky for issuing new
> releases.
>
> I'd suggest hg + hgweb on a personal server + mailing list is
> sufficient, but I guess github is the new sexy collaborative way to do
> things so that's probably as good and requires less dedicated personal
> resources.
>
> Steve
> --
> Debian GNU/Linux System Administration
> http://www.debian-administration.org/
>
>
>
--
Jonathan Aquilina
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sym.noone.org/pipermail/xen-tools-discuss/attachments/20100410/10d2a30d/attachment.htm>
More information about the xen-tools-discuss
mailing list