[xen-tools-discuss] Commit access for others / Git or Hg?

[Jonathan Aquilina]

im just wondering now guys as this is being worked on how often will the
scripts be updated for newer versions of ubuntu for instance? the current
version that i have tried which hasnt been for some time its lacking the
latest ubuntu download mirrors, or does xen-tools just support ubuntu long
term releases?

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Steve Kemp <steve at steve.org.uk> wrote:

> On Sat Apr 10, 2010 at 14:36:50 +0200, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> >    only reason i suggested SF is i have seen it for another project one
> on a
> >    bigger scale and pull from the git repo isnt bad at all not sure about
> >    commiting as i havent had time to join the dev team of this particular
> >    project. i just thought i would throw my 2 cents in there.
>
>   In practice I guess we'll end up in a situation with:
>
>    * 1-5 people making commits, regularly.
>    * 1-5 people declaring "new release".
>    * 10-100 people downloading a release tarball.
>    * 100-2000 people getting the package via Debian, Ubuntu, repos,
>    etc.
>
>  On that basis I think whatever solution is picked should be one that
>  requires the least work for the 1-5 people doing the
>  commits/management.
>
>  Anyway I have no real stake so I'll bow out now, and leave either
>  a consensus to develop or a firm decision to be made by Axel :)
>
> Steve
> --
>
>


-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sym.noone.org/pipermail/xen-tools-discuss/attachments/20100410/4fda88e3/attachment.htm>