On 12/5/06, Steve Kemp <steve_at_steve.org.uk> wrote:
> [...]
> I could add a "force-no-kernel" and "force-no-initrd" but the
> idea of adding more and more specific options seems a bit painful.
> Hence the suggestion to just add a new meaning to --force - if
> you have a strong preference then persuade me ;)
no, I think assuming the user knows what he does when not specifying
any kernel value is good enough. The default configs comes with a
kernel example - when somebidy removes this, he must have a reason.
As well as saying --force forces everything and adds no checks (while
the former would already solve my problems, I guess).
Henning
Received on Tue Dec 05 2006 - 14:41:10 GMT