On Tue, Dec 05, 2006 at 03:40:39PM +0100, Henning Sprang wrote:
> On 12/5/06, Steve Kemp <steve_at_steve.org.uk> wrote:
> >[...]
> > I could add a "force-no-kernel" and "force-no-initrd" but the
> > idea of adding more and more specific options seems a bit painful.
> > Hence the suggestion to just add a new meaning to --force - if
> > you have a strong preference then persuade me ;)
>
> no, I think assuming the user knows what he does when not specifying
> any kernel value is good enough. The default configs comes with a
> kernel example - when somebidy removes this, he must have a reason.
OK. I guess that makes sense. I will drop the existence check then.
Steve
--
Received on Tue Dec 05 2006 - 14:49:17 GMT