[xen-tools-discuss] Xen 4.0 / Commit access for others / Git or Hg?

[Jonathan Aquilina]

i noticed your mention of git there is also sourceforge.net that has
maililng lists as well but has git i believe with multiple access for
multiple users.

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Axel Beckert <abe at deuxchevaux.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 01:44:01PM +0200, Dmitry Nedospasov wrote:
> > On 10.4.10 13:14, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > > If anyone plays around with it before I do and notices any 4.0 related
> > > problems in the xen-tools version at http://noone.org/hg/xen-tools/,
> > > please let me know.
> >
> > Hmm, on a slightly different note, whats the status of xen-tools
> > again?
>
> Work in progress. :-)
>
> I plan to upload 4.2 RC1 (or so) to Debian unstable soon.
>
> Next step would be to move over the website and mailing list to my
> hosting so the website will be uptodate again. (We can't easily move
> the website without the mailing list otherwise this would have been
> done already.)
>
> Steve: I'm still pondering if I should move over the ML to my Mailman
> installation or install skxlist on my server. Any comment from the
> skxlist author? :-)
>
> > I'm doing some of my own maintaining as well, adding scripts for karmic
> > etc...
>
> Sounds as we should merge them into the official repository. :-)
>
> > Should we maybe look for a centralized sollution?
>
> Do you mean a repository with commit access for more than one person?
> Yeah, that would be definitely a good thing.
>
> Anyone has experience with http://bitbucket.org/ or
> http://sharesource.org/? (FreeHg.org seems to have died already
> again.) Or anyones know any other hosting service else like github.com
> or repo.or.cz just for Mercurial? SourceForge seems to offer Mercurial
> hosting[1], too, but I'm no such big fan of SF. Its website feels
> clumsy to me and the recent website redesign didn't help at all...
>
>  [1] http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/wiki/Mercurial
>
> Or shall we move over to git? In that case I would prefer repo.or.cz
> as central repository since I have only good experiences there yet
> from another project. But if more than one person favours github.com
> over repo.or.cz, I would also use that one.
>
> > I also want to make a centos package of xen-tools.
>
> Would be happy to have that included in the VCS repository, too.
>
>
>
>                Regards, Axel
> --
> Axel Beckert - abe at deuxchevaux.org, abe at noone.org - http://noone.org/abe/
>
>


-- 
Jonathan Aquilina
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sym.noone.org/pipermail/xen-tools-discuss/attachments/20100410/2513794d/attachment.htm>