[xen-tools-discuss] Bug#603708: Suggests non-existing xen-shell

[Joachim Breitner]

[Please CC me on replies, thanks]

Hi,

Am Dienstag, den 16.11.2010, 18:15 +0100 schrieb Axel Beckert:
> Joachim Breitner wrote:

> > (Actually, I'd be happy if you turn this bug into a ITP xen-shell.
> > I'm running an etch server with Xen + xen-tools + xen-shell and
> > would be happy if I could just upgrade that to squeeze... :-))
> 
> Unfortunately nobody of our upstream xen-tools team uses xen-shell, so
> xen-shell is currently without upstream developer.
> 
> But I'll happily help everyone who wants to continue the xen-shell
> development.

understandable position. I don’t use it enough to maintain it myself,
either.

Speaking of upgrades: Will the xen-tools in squeeze work with a
configuration created on etch, e.g. can I safely upgrade when squeeze is
released? Or have things changed a lot under the hood?

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata at debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://xen-tools.org/pipermail/xen-tools-discuss/attachments/20101116/ca24569e/attachment.pgp>